What is mental health according to Lacan?
What is mental health according to Lacan?
According to Lacan, when is a person "mentally healthy"?
Thanks.
EDIT:
I'm asking because the topic has become relevant for the country I live in. Namely, presidential elections are coming up in Slovenia, and one of the candidates is a psychoterapist who is a devout Lacanian. Given that she is implicitly supported by the second biggest political party in the country, she has good chances of winning. In interviews, she says that our society is "toxic" and that her task as the president of the country will be to make it "healthy". However, it's not clear how she intends to do that. She keeps referring to Lacan. Because she's a psychotherapist, some people give her unconditional credence to be the ultimate judge of what is going on in the psyche of the people. The matter is further confounding because iek criticizes her, yet they are supposedly both devout Lacanians.
I once started reading some Lacan, but gave up soon. I again tried to acquaint myself, but still cannot answer the OP question.
According to Lacan, when is a person "mentally healthy"?
Thanks.
EDIT:
I'm asking because the topic has become relevant for the country I live in. Namely, presidential elections are coming up in Slovenia, and one of the candidates is a psychoterapist who is a devout Lacanian. Given that she is implicitly supported by the second biggest political party in the country, she has good chances of winning. In interviews, she says that our society is "toxic" and that her task as the president of the country will be to make it "healthy". However, it's not clear how she intends to do that. She keeps referring to Lacan. Because she's a psychotherapist, some people give her unconditional credence to be the ultimate judge of what is going on in the psyche of the people. The matter is further confounding because iek criticizes her, yet they are supposedly both devout Lacanians.
I once started reading some Lacan, but gave up soon. I again tried to acquaint myself, but still cannot answer the OP question.
Comments (14)
He's not clear on any topic. Some Lacanian psychoanalysts even go as far as arguing that a person with a drinking problem may do well to continue drinking or that "anxiety" is the one emotion that does not lie. Why? It's not argued for.
The best sources I found on Lacan were Using Lacanian Clinical Technique by Phillip Hill and the various books on Lacan from Bruce Fink, especially A Clinical Introduction of Lacanian Psychoanalysis.
I hear that Lacan's published seminars are easier to understand than his Ecrits (his main work), but have not read them. Many were not published when I was into his thought back in 2011 or so.
Finally, the best Lacanian, by far - and even he has problems in his scholarship (bad sources, makes up information, etc. This is documented) - is iek. He is entertaining and sometimes says interesting things. His lectures (of which almost all) can be found on YouTube, and are superior to his books.
His documentaries on films are interesting. Take them with grains of salt.
I know that doesn't answer your question and I would recommend you listen to a few of iek's lectures and call it a day, as I've seen people go down the Lacanian rabbit-hole and never come back.
I hope your experience on this end up being more useful than mine.
Mental health = IQ + EQ = Xin (heart-mind)???
Yes, good observation. The dark side of moralism is fascism.
Hmmm... :chin:
Probably not a great deal, but it might have a lot more to do with psychology of any sort getting together with politics.
Mentally healthy folks think like me, and therefore the opposition is mad and needs to be locked up and given treatment until they think like me.
So if you are so fortunate as to promote a therapist to president, it would be the madness of a toxic society to ever remove her; anyone suggesting such a thing will be in urgent need of treatment for their own good and that of society. Some toxins may need to be eliminated from the body politic, and asylums will have graveyards.
Politicians can rule the land and the body, but don't let them into your head at any price.
Then it won't matter much. It's a bit like Leninists, there can be left wing or right wing Leninists.
Zizek claims to be a left Lacanian and categorizes Miller (Lacan's official editor and translator) as a right wing Lacanian.
In short, I don't think you'll find much, despite the references.
But surely Lacanian theory is about _something_?
Found this:
Yeah, sure, you'll get directed to several sites with lots of information, sometimes conflicting, sometimes not. I'm not saying there's nothing to it, but it is of dubious quality to me.
Honestly, your best bet would be rod the Lacan for Beginners comic book book. The series is quite good and can be read rather quickly.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JGE4BNS/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
If that doesn't provide clues to an answer, I can't think of anything else.
The point is that he is so obscure, that it is assumed that people who read him, must be smart. Add to that the "Dr." label, and you can get a lot of unquestioned dogma or nonsense.
Anyway, I'll stop here.