The Torture Paradox
Extreme pain (Torture) is worse than Death (Murder)!
However, the penalty for torture is less severe than the penalty for murder.
WTF?
:chin:
However, the penalty for torture is less severe than the penalty for murder.
WTF?
:chin:
Comments (11)
Don't you think there is far more nuance to criminal sentences with respect to who did what and how bad it was and what the law is wherever it happened? All murder, neither all torture, is the same. Justify your lazy generalization (cite something).
Quoting Nils Loc
I've never heard of anyone being given the death penalty for torture. Have you?
Currently it looks like you're right. Everyone on death row is there for murder.
One can imagine the death penalty is suitable for a depraved serial torturer if it is suitable for other kinds of murder. Could there be some room in the law for applying it despite custom/precedent, if the evidence was really crazy (Sawmovie stuff that could kill if it got out of hand)?
Maybe all the most extreme serial torturers just happen to end up murdering their victims so it's very unlikely that you'll have one crime without the other. The dead can't tattletale so easily.
I sense a disturbance in the Force.
Good answer! :up:
Doesn't that make torture worse? Torture tortures the survivors more than "Murder tortures the survivors"?
Good advice! Leave that to the other people.
Schools basically kill the spirit of learning in countless amounts of children. Is that not akin to murder?
This is an example of the availability bias. Physical murder is obvious to the senses. Intellectual murder is invisible.