Philosophical AI
I've been experimenting with a new AI-powered prompt generator called "Narrative Device". And I thought I would give it some philosophical inputs, to see what it returned as outputs. Along those lines, here are a series of philosophical themes in pairs, alongside the musings of this Artificial Intelligence:
Contemplation One
Inputs: "meaning of life" and "mindfulness"
Output: "It was always a question that plagued her mind. What was the meaning of life? Was there a greater purpose to it all? Or was it just a never-ending cycle of pain and suffering? She had read all the great philosophers and thinkers, but none of them seemed to have the answer. Maybe the answer was something that couldn't be found in a book. Maybe she needed to look within herself. She decided to meditate and see if she could find the answer. After years of searching, she finally found the answer. Life was about being present in the moment and appreciating the beauty of the world around her. It was about being mindful of her thoughts and actions and making sure they aligned with her values. It was about living with purpose and intention. And it was about finding happiness in the simple things."
Contemplation Two
Inputs: "logic" and "disbelief"
Output: "Lenny loved numbers. He loved the way they always made sense, the way they were always logical. But when his best friend told him that sometimes two plus two didn't equal four, Lenny didn't believe it."
Contemplation Three
Inputs: "post-truth" and "philosophical significance"
Output: "The year is 20xx and the world is in a state of post-truth. Fake news is rampant and people are more concerned with their own opinions than with facts. In such a world, it is hard to know what is real and what is not. But one thing is certain: the philosophical significance of truth has never been more important."
Contemplation Four
Inputs: "philosophy" and "science"
Output: "As a philosophy student, I was always interested in the relationship between science and philosophy. I never thought that I would find myself in a position to explore that relationship firsthand, but that's exactly what happened when I was selected for a prestigious research grant. I was given the opportunity to work with some of the leading scientists in the field, and to explore the implications of our findings from a philosophical perspective. It was an exciting and challenging experience, and I'm grateful for the opportunity to have taken part in it."
Contemplation Five
Inputs: "excessive thinking" and "modern society"
Output: "I often find myself excessive thinking about the state of modern society. How we are so connected to our technology and devices, yet we are more isolated than ever before. How our need for instant gratification has lead to a general sense of entitlement. How we are so quick to judge and criticize, yet we are often blind to our own faults. It's enough to make my head spin."
Contemplation One
Inputs: "meaning of life" and "mindfulness"
Output: "It was always a question that plagued her mind. What was the meaning of life? Was there a greater purpose to it all? Or was it just a never-ending cycle of pain and suffering? She had read all the great philosophers and thinkers, but none of them seemed to have the answer. Maybe the answer was something that couldn't be found in a book. Maybe she needed to look within herself. She decided to meditate and see if she could find the answer. After years of searching, she finally found the answer. Life was about being present in the moment and appreciating the beauty of the world around her. It was about being mindful of her thoughts and actions and making sure they aligned with her values. It was about living with purpose and intention. And it was about finding happiness in the simple things."
Contemplation Two
Inputs: "logic" and "disbelief"
Output: "Lenny loved numbers. He loved the way they always made sense, the way they were always logical. But when his best friend told him that sometimes two plus two didn't equal four, Lenny didn't believe it."
Contemplation Three
Inputs: "post-truth" and "philosophical significance"
Output: "The year is 20xx and the world is in a state of post-truth. Fake news is rampant and people are more concerned with their own opinions than with facts. In such a world, it is hard to know what is real and what is not. But one thing is certain: the philosophical significance of truth has never been more important."
Contemplation Four
Inputs: "philosophy" and "science"
Output: "As a philosophy student, I was always interested in the relationship between science and philosophy. I never thought that I would find myself in a position to explore that relationship firsthand, but that's exactly what happened when I was selected for a prestigious research grant. I was given the opportunity to work with some of the leading scientists in the field, and to explore the implications of our findings from a philosophical perspective. It was an exciting and challenging experience, and I'm grateful for the opportunity to have taken part in it."
Contemplation Five
Inputs: "excessive thinking" and "modern society"
Output: "I often find myself excessive thinking about the state of modern society. How we are so connected to our technology and devices, yet we are more isolated than ever before. How our need for instant gratification has lead to a general sense of entitlement. How we are so quick to judge and criticize, yet we are often blind to our own faults. It's enough to make my head spin."
Comments (25)
It would be interesting to see several AI philosophers tackle a problem and see how well they are able to use all the philosophical works ever written to counter each others points. Still, it would require human input to set the parameters of each AI bot.
What makes this any different from how philosophy is "done" among humans?
Quoting I like sushi
This would indeed be interesting. I'll wager that accomplishing such a showcase wouldn't be too difficult.
Humans can actively create new phrases that actually have intent behind them. AI cannot. AI would, at best, be a pseudomystic - spouting phrases that others attach meaning to.
Would be nice to see each AI argue using a certain philosophers body of work and then adjusting according to what other AI say from their philosophical bodies of work.
It would at least be a way of showing inconsistencies and commonalities between philosophers I am not convinced they would do a good job though. There is a great deal of complexity in human communication and one small error could throw the whole thing off the track.
That would make it even more realistic.
:up: :100:
Quoting Bret Bernhoft
It is not possible and it is even a paradox to let the AI thinking for themselves. I say it is a paradox because if it is complex to progress on knowledge by our own personal skills... Why we should put this task in a machine? Keep in mind that these "programmes" or "algorithms" do exist thanks to us. We create them. So, it is not possible to create something clever than us if we don't reach the peak of knowledge yet.
How can an AI defines realism if we didn't teach them what is "real" yet?
:clap: :nerd:
Quoting Bret Bernhoft
Even when such an AI (publicly) comes online, why should we listen to such an entity spouting nostroms about "human existence and our meanings" when it does not itself have any human existential skin in the game? :chin:
AI is good at picking up patterns in images and also sounds too. We need to translate concepts/ideas/theories/whathaveyous into images/sounds, this is the hard part, and then let AI do its thing, this is the easy part.
What do you think guys and ... gals (if any)? :sad:
This is along the lines of how I assume Artificial Intelligence will be useful in the world of understanding the big picture questions; AI can collate unimaginably large pools of data and find the common (even outlying) patterns therein. This is, in my opinion, a asset tool to gain access to. For a lot of reasons.
I concur. We must treat computers as a distinct linguistic species - our job is to translate human ideas into machine language. If they're good at finding patterns in pictures, let's give 'em pictures, oui monsieur? The question is how do we render the abstract (ideas) concrete (images)?
By feeding them everything we can create! Those machines are hungry.
Sounds like a plan!
No. The marketing industry would insert adverts in every few lines. Next thing, you'll be reading extra virgin olive oil, yogurt, fromage, and travel guides in the passages.
Perhaps, but the winnowing of experience separates the wisdom from the babble. Yet, Age alone doesn't make you wise, it just makes you old. Wisdom is the ability to know the difference between What-Is and What-Ought-To-Be. :smile:
Global Reference
A better question would be: "Could AI provide etc.?" It seems the answer is no, since there's nothing original in the outputs provided.
Just as with AI images, the AI doesn't create anything new but uses a set of millions of images as its baseline to generate new forms on top. This kind of looks like how humans generate new things by combining ideas from the past into something new, but the AI doesn't have ingenuity, it can only act upon human input instruction to generate something, meaning, the ingenuity is always human. It's like taking the part out of the mind of a human that revolves around combining memories into something new, without any guideline as to a goal for that new idea, essentially, it's like having severe mental illness and a constant psychotic breakdown.
The problem with how the public reacts or thinks about our current algorithmic AIs is that people think that these programs "think" just because it looks like they are. It's a fundamentally wrong analysis of how current AI functions based on a misunderstanding of its processes and human psychology.
The Silicates were created to be servants and soldiers but they developed intelligence and sentience after they were infected by the Take a Chance computer virus created by Dr. Ken Stranahan (name from the show's visual effects supervisor). This sparked an AI rebellion by the Silicates, who attempted to free themselves from human rule. The war continued for many years, until the Silicates captured military space craft and escaped into space. As they went into space, the Silicates suffered from a lack of maintenance which caused problems for them. The remnants of the Silicates that fled into deep space serve as mercenaries and actually aid the alien Chigs in their war against humanity.
[/quote]
Space Above and Beyond was a television series which ran for one season from 1995 to 1996.
The ai (Silicates) contemplated philosophy amongst many things but they could not come up with anything new themselves.
So interesting. Nevertheless, I think we the humans are not originals on philosophy either.
Whatever the theories which have always been written they follow the basic principles or "roots" from Greek mythology.
Well in that very context, people from (ancient) Greece were humans as well, as were the early philosophers from China.