The Twerk That Shook the Nation
I guess it's no surprise that conservatives would freak about something like this, though their reasoning is strange. Ben Crocker writes in an article published in The Federalist:
It is the twerk that seems to evince in any crowd a manifest succumbing to the worst angels of our natures. The brainless shrieks of approval, the demented adulation for an unveiled sexuality not content with mere liberality, but further possessed of a flippant, aggressive, and unapologetically performative disposition.
And all the more to applaud you see, because James Madison – James Madison! – bore symbolic witness to the madness.
Can she really do that in the presence of the founding fathers?
Of course she can. And the prepossessed audacity to exhibit that behavior — the banality, the crudity, the do-what-I-wantity — whilst in that hallowed presence, is the whole point of the exercise.
For this is the culture that delights in the desecration of the sacred. The desecration that is sometimes unthinkingly casual, but often deliberately profane.
Desecration of the sacred?
Personally, I think it's beautiful that James Madison bore symbolic witness to a black woman's bold expression of empowerment, particularly because James was a typical slaveholder. He owned over a hundred human beings at one point, worked them from dawn to dusk, and never freed any of them.
Do-what-I-fucking-wantity indeed.
From what I briefly gather Madison wasn't particularly religious and wasn't a musician, so I assume his hallowedness is essentially founded on his being a leader of the nation. Traditionalists revere their leaders. The problem is that in modernity there are no true traditionalists. Pretty much everyone can categorize art, religion, politics, and the state. No one believes that the American presidency is somehow tied to God like a link in the great chain of being, least of all Ben Crocker who is highly critical and disrespectful of the current president of the United States. Would he care if Lizzo twerked while playing Biden's flute? No.
Lizzo was classically trained since childhood, btw. Here she is playing with the NY Philharmonic.
So what do you think, sacred or profane?
Comments (25)
One person, a woman, once reprimanded me, rather obliquely, that, basically, there's eating and there's dining - two very different things! No points for guessing whether I was eating or dining at the table.
Are people that bored that this is actually ‘news’ now?
I think the question is what Lizzo's art stands for versus what the art of the crystal flute stands for.
I think it's undeniable that Lizzo's art stands for the empowerment of the marginalized, to some degree at least. She's a large woman, for instance, and unabashedly celebrates her shape. In some sense she is asking us to see beauty where we typically do not. That's what worthwhile art does.
The flute was made by Claude Laurent, a Parisian watchmaker and mechanic, in honor of MadisonÂ’s second inauguration. Apparently, the crystal flute is a novelty item and Lizzo is the first to have played the instrument so it's not revered for its performance quality.
I suppose the flute most distinctively stands for, by mere association/ownership, a particular founding father of the nation, James Madison. What does Madison stand for? Certainly not wokeness. Does that mean that the flute stands for anti-wokeness? It does, because people like Ben Crocker and Ben Shapiro are essentially saying that it does and those who are oblivious may follow their lead. It is their choice to claim what the flute stands for.
What is her art? She is a musician right? Does she always make music about such a topic? Is she particularly political?
It ainÂ’t over till the fat lady sings.
[/b]
That's a good point. Rather than defiling the object as some claim, Lizzo actually raised its value, and I would guess that it also, by design, raised awareness of treasures that the Library of Congress holds. How many Americans knew that there are crystal flutes, much less that Jimmyboy owned one and it could be seen at the Library of Congress? Few, I think.
I gave my impression of her as a performer or brand, if you will.
It's hard enough to take this seriously without half-baked jokes being thrown into the mix.
Your meaning is not clear. Could you please rephrase this for added clarity?
I think this is a case of people imaging people care and that the people imagining this care are also imaginary.
Praxis must be taking the piss Â… nothing else makes sense.
IÂ’m fluent in English, if thatÂ’s helpful for you to know about me.
What most interests me is the part where you touch on “only now being looked at in a negative light”. What’s that about? Can you please elucidate on that?
Quoting praxis
The only thing serious about this spectacle is how horribly offended my eyeballs have become after seeing such a disgusting whale wearing a hooker costume.
YouÂ’re simply describing the way things are Â… if she was to devote her time to eating less hotdogs and going for some excercise Â… in 6 months time youÂ’d pay for an hour of her companyÂ…
And she plays a mean flute.
Where do you live where streetwalkers can afford an outfit like that?
Back in the day slavery and genocide were a-okay, or so say the anti-presentists. Everyone was doing it, and doing it was legal. It wasn't a-okay with those enslaved or in the process of being slaughtered, of course, and in fact we modern folk still value freedom and life. Imagine that, after two hundred years of progress and change, people still value freedom and life. The more things change the more they stay the same, it seems, doesn't it?
Never. I doubt she could crack the 300 barrier with diey and exercise alone. Behemoths like that require major surgery to slim down to a healthy weight.
Quoting Deus
That is always a plus in my book. Nevertheless, she is still a vomitous specimen to look at in that hooker costume.
You would be surprised at the amount a good pimp will pay for clothes for his hoes.
:up: :sparkle:
They invest in show their products in the storefront.