Philosophy Is Comedy
Its a party until,
TALKING HEAD 1
Now, brother. What you wanna do is actuate into
practice the highest manifestation of yourself.
TALKING HEAD 2
You talkin aesthetics of selfhood, aint cha?
TALKING HEAD 1
Sho you right. But wait a minute. Consider the pleasure
of the public through art. You caint jes please yosef.
TALKING HEAD 2
How you gonna please others aint pleasin yosef?
TALKING HEAD 1
Well, did Jimi Hendrix invent heavy metal?
TALKING HEAD 2
Now listen up. Taz Lightnin taught
Hank Williams his fundamentals and --
SOCIALITE 1
Gentlemen! Pondering the imponderables, are we?
SOCIALITE 2
Im getting hors doeuvres in the other room. Anybody?
SOCIALITE 1
Me too!
SOCIALITE 3
Me three!
As the heady conversation progresses, the socially adept vacate the den for hors doeuvres in the living room. For more on the conversation:
https://youtu.be/8ts2ePmYEQ4
https://youtu.be/Emf10fPkVT4
Philosophy is laugh-out-loud good times for those who love it, especially in the heat of battle with all marbles on the table.
The best philosophers want to live beyond winning_losing because know it or not being any good losing-yet-interesting is better than winning-but-conventional. It means the dance is not over and losing to keep dancing like 180 Proof taught me about gamblers thats passion, man!
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/672802
Whats more fun if youre a blabbermouth than answering a question that cant be answered?
Whats more inspiring than buffooning for a planet lacking all desire to solve the worlds problems?
When I say philosophy is comedy, I dont exactly mean: a fusillade of Henny Youngman one-liners; Bob Hope snarking the mighty with taunts; Dave Chappelle body-slamming the sexual diaspora.
I mean Quine dropkicking analyticity with some anti-de re modal logic before getting pancaked into the mud by Kripke and Plantinga.
Philosophy can get serious see word salad above but, essentially, it aint serious. Its comedy. Entertainment, yall.
When a politician declares war, alerting the nation to the best and the brightest going down harms way, losing their lives, thats drama. War can sometimes make us laugh, but, essentially, its unfunny.
Philosophy looks serious, until you get close enough to see Wizard of Oz in a big mask; a Munchkin backstage pulling levers keeping alive illusion of lion at full roar.
Some modal logic: the politician declaring war aint funny whilst the philosopher declaring war on declaring war is funny. The two declarations are in different modes.
If youre a sane person, its no fun sending young people to their destruction. Drama.
If youre a passionate person, its big fun debating sending young people to their destruction. Comedy.
Its the difference of intentions that separates the politician from the philosopher. The politician, declaring war, grabs the necessity prong of the Modal Logic Fork. The philosopher, declaring war-on-war, grabs the possibility prong.
Well, thats the logical difference between drama and comedy. Drama concerns real and necessary danger. Comedy concerns possible and avoidable danger. Drama breeds dread, comedy breeds (release of pent up anxiety) laughter.
Since life always presents danger, the omnipresence of danger sometimes makes drama look like comedy and vice versa.
How is it that philosophy, so formidably intellectual, lands in the comedy column?
By its nature, philosophy cannot be content with reality per se. Serious concern with reality per se is reportage.
When you look at some of the raging debates herein, the question: What is real? appears important.
Well, the question: What is real? is metaphysics. Well, as soon as youre asking that question, reality becomes a football kicking up, down and around the field.
Philosophy tries to land on the necessity prong of the Modal Logic Fork; it does land on the possible prong.
The blood face of passionate ideas gets expressed to audience. With racing mind and pounding heart, Starbuck transforms mundane into vivid. Dance the dance with jeering, you fancy thinker.
Everybody wants to give world their piece of mind. Whos got ego enough to do it?
We do!
TALKING HEAD 1
Now, brother. What you wanna do is actuate into
practice the highest manifestation of yourself.
TALKING HEAD 2
You talkin aesthetics of selfhood, aint cha?
TALKING HEAD 1
Sho you right. But wait a minute. Consider the pleasure
of the public through art. You caint jes please yosef.
TALKING HEAD 2
How you gonna please others aint pleasin yosef?
TALKING HEAD 1
Well, did Jimi Hendrix invent heavy metal?
TALKING HEAD 2
Now listen up. Taz Lightnin taught
Hank Williams his fundamentals and --
SOCIALITE 1
Gentlemen! Pondering the imponderables, are we?
SOCIALITE 2
Im getting hors doeuvres in the other room. Anybody?
SOCIALITE 1
Me too!
SOCIALITE 3
Me three!
As the heady conversation progresses, the socially adept vacate the den for hors doeuvres in the living room. For more on the conversation:
https://youtu.be/8ts2ePmYEQ4
https://youtu.be/Emf10fPkVT4
Philosophy is laugh-out-loud good times for those who love it, especially in the heat of battle with all marbles on the table.
The best philosophers want to live beyond winning_losing because know it or not being any good losing-yet-interesting is better than winning-but-conventional. It means the dance is not over and losing to keep dancing like 180 Proof taught me about gamblers thats passion, man!
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/672802
Whats more fun if youre a blabbermouth than answering a question that cant be answered?
Whats more inspiring than buffooning for a planet lacking all desire to solve the worlds problems?
When I say philosophy is comedy, I dont exactly mean: a fusillade of Henny Youngman one-liners; Bob Hope snarking the mighty with taunts; Dave Chappelle body-slamming the sexual diaspora.
I mean Quine dropkicking analyticity with some anti-de re modal logic before getting pancaked into the mud by Kripke and Plantinga.
Philosophy can get serious see word salad above but, essentially, it aint serious. Its comedy. Entertainment, yall.
When a politician declares war, alerting the nation to the best and the brightest going down harms way, losing their lives, thats drama. War can sometimes make us laugh, but, essentially, its unfunny.
Philosophy looks serious, until you get close enough to see Wizard of Oz in a big mask; a Munchkin backstage pulling levers keeping alive illusion of lion at full roar.
Some modal logic: the politician declaring war aint funny whilst the philosopher declaring war on declaring war is funny. The two declarations are in different modes.
If youre a sane person, its no fun sending young people to their destruction. Drama.
If youre a passionate person, its big fun debating sending young people to their destruction. Comedy.
Its the difference of intentions that separates the politician from the philosopher. The politician, declaring war, grabs the necessity prong of the Modal Logic Fork. The philosopher, declaring war-on-war, grabs the possibility prong.
Well, thats the logical difference between drama and comedy. Drama concerns real and necessary danger. Comedy concerns possible and avoidable danger. Drama breeds dread, comedy breeds (release of pent up anxiety) laughter.
Since life always presents danger, the omnipresence of danger sometimes makes drama look like comedy and vice versa.
How is it that philosophy, so formidably intellectual, lands in the comedy column?
By its nature, philosophy cannot be content with reality per se. Serious concern with reality per se is reportage.
When you look at some of the raging debates herein, the question: What is real? appears important.
Well, the question: What is real? is metaphysics. Well, as soon as youre asking that question, reality becomes a football kicking up, down and around the field.
Philosophy tries to land on the necessity prong of the Modal Logic Fork; it does land on the possible prong.
The blood face of passionate ideas gets expressed to audience. With racing mind and pounding heart, Starbuck transforms mundane into vivid. Dance the dance with jeering, you fancy thinker.
Everybody wants to give world their piece of mind. Whos got ego enough to do it?
We do!
Comments (30)
I didn't even get one laugh out of the Critique of Pure Reason.
Just sayin'.
[quote=Oscar Wilde]Life is too important to be taken seriously.[/quote]
Well, for me, philosophy is inherently absurdist rather than comedic (even though most philosophizers are clowns).
Philosophy is just a form of critical thinking. Unfortunately, not a lot of people know how to do it well nowadays as we are too often forced to act without really thinking about what we are doing. This is likely more true for people in the US than other places in the world.
:clap: :grin:
:ok: :smile:
Quoting dclements
Agreed. Can we also make space for a bit of imagination?
Quoting dclements
Yes. Info overload.
Quoting dclements
R-O-C-K-IN-THE-U-S-A! - Faster_smarter_better; condensed books; one-minute eggs; Cliff Notes; NFL highlight reels; motel rooms by the hour; muscle cars; fast food...
https://youtu.be/9p3DzUwxI0o
Quoting Philosophim
What you say is true. The big "however" is no human (like me) is logical all of the time nor entirely without ego. :rofl:
Quoting ucarr
Funny how? How is philosophy funny? Like a clown?
Divine comedy therefore.
"My mind was writing checks my body couldn't cash."
Quoting Joshs
Aw, man! You almost got me!
It makes everybody laugh. :rofl:
Sword of truth!
I've wondered what happens to those when a philosopher loses them. Now I see where they end up.
My own, perhaps idiosyncratic, take on philosophy as joke, a laughable matter, a ludicrous proposition ...
Philosophy is like one of those small mock-up towns, complete with dummy occupants equipped with sensors, and gas station, and convenience stores, and a children's park, etc., constructed specifically to test the destructive power of atomic bombs (critical thinking).
Oh, yeah! Aspirant philosopher-in-training knuckles down with his grandfather-to-thumb-acer (all black, of course). Thinks he's gonna win! And yea! Pulls it off! Grand prize, all-expenses-paid vacation in the The Twilight Zone.
Long stretch of time with dozens of mock-ups getting vaporized until, one fateful day, the atomic hurricane knocks the latest Hooterville sideways and... it stays upright, un-vaporized. Influx of residents as real estate values skyrocket. Join the cocktail party chit-chat and you're bound to hear someone say, "Are you cotton to the latest take on being post-modern? Gender phantasia!"
Day-old bread for the rabble.
:grin: Flattery comes unexpected. Thank-you for putting my name near your beautiful thought.
There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke
But you and I, we've been through that, and this is not our fate
So let us not talk falsely, the hour is getting late[/quote]
:up: We're in for a treat!
Still, laughter has a way of helping complex or rough ideas go down smoother.
As Wittgenstein famously said, a serious work of philosophy could be done consisting mostly of jokes.
Or as Schopenhauer said, on an individual basis life appears as tragedy, but looked at from a species perspective, life look like a comedy.
If I sometimes laugh to myself, it is because the questions I ask are so difficult to even give a bad guess, then humor must be a component. As I was walking today, I don't know why I was contemplating what constitutes a trivial answer? What makes something obvious to everybody (or most people anyway) as opposed to something that is not obvious?
Maybe something to do with immediate awareness and expectation, but, I couldn't go further. So I laughed - briefly mind you, not like seeing Monty Python or something.
But, at the same time, for me, philosophy fundamentally begins with what Raymond Tallis said, "astonishment".
And if front of the astonishing, I suppose many reactions are valid.
Thanks for weighing in. I hope youll keep doing so.
:up: