Nourishment pill
Let's say you can take a pill once a day that gives you all the nourishment you need, the pill also prevents stomach and mouth issues that would happen if you don't eat/chew stuff like scurvy, it also prevents bad breath, but you still have to brush your teeth to prevent tartar. You can still eat stuff, but it would not give you any needed nourishment and would come with all the negatives of eating, the only purpose to eat therefore would be for pleasure.
You still need to drink water to survive.
You still need to drink water to survive.
Comments (22)
:up:
The sharing of regular, scheduled meals is worth the effort; the pleasure of good food is a bonus. Of course, the pill could be tailored to specific dietary needs - but is it? Dining out on special occasions is something to anticipate and cherish; the odd spontaneous restaurant lunch or picnic outing is fun.
Medication is necessary, but I don't think we could make a daily occasion of taking a pill together.
:up:
I don't generally eat meals with others as it happens. My partner and I maintain separate homes - I could never live with someone. Fortunately she feels the same and it has worked for many years. We eat together 2 or 3 times a week.
If it was a necessity then obviously everyone would take it, But it is not, therefore why deprive oneself of the pleasures attached to the ritual of eating.
Would you still take the pill when you're together?
How about family gatherings at Thanksgiving and Christmas, or social events, like weddings and charity fund-raisers? Or just plain dinner parties with friends and colleagues? So many human bonding rituals are centered on the sharing of food.
Many people would not want a pill, simply because they enjoy eating; some even enjoy cooking, baking and selecting ingredients, never mind the pleasure of growing vegetables and fruit.
This is what I hoped would be brought up. When does it turn into hedonism? When I said "You can still eat stuff, but it would not give you any needed nourishment and would come with all the negatives of eating", I wanted to imply that you get all the negatives without getting the positives. Wouldn't eating then be like smoking or at least like drinking beer?
The negatives are optional. We can choose a wholesome diet and eat in moderation, just as we can choose to imbibe alcoholic beverages in moderation. The positives include far more than physical nourishment. Our bodies are constructed to use food: I wonder what would happen to the digestive system if it were deprived of substantial material to process.
Yes, we often joke about what a drag having to rustle up a lunch is. I can see us popping a pill in the car together then going about our business without the need to disrupt our activities with a sit down meal. Wonderful.
Quoting Vera Mont
Well, I am a little different to some people. I don't generally attend parties or dinners. Last dinner party I went to took place years ago. But I do sometimes go out to a restaurant with a friend. I have already written that I would reserve eating for the occasional 'recreational' meal. So if I wanted to celebrate something with good food, I would happily eat then.
When I said it is not necessary I meant that taking the pill is not necessary because food still is available. So if I am not taking the pill I would still need nourishment even if it came with all the negatives of eating. But it would also have the benefits I mentioned
Quoting Lionino
You meant to imply but did not do so, so it does not count.
Quoting Lionino
Only if I ate and drank more that I needed excessively. But I would have a shitload more fun doing it than you would swallowing a pill.
Quoting Lionino
The benefits being pleasure.
Quoting Sir2u
Or you could take a pill and avoid every downside of eating (bloating, toxins, phytic acid, heavy metals etc).
Another down-side: employers would cut lunch hour to 2 minutes a day.
That is what life is all about, if you don't enjoy it what is the point of living it.
Quoting Lionino
:chin: You forgot to include wear on teeth, wasted time cooking, having to use a truck to take the food to the shop, having to sit down for a few minutes to put food in your mouth, having to take a shit once in a while and probably a whole bunch of other reasons you should not eat. :smirk:
Ain't that the truth. :rofl:
Pleasure? So hedonism? :grin:
Quoting Sir2u
True, I remember reading that eating also damages DNA.
Sex to, maybe you could come up with a pill to stop the need for that as well.
Don't worry, the government is already on it.