Waveframe cosmology ToE
Waveframe Cosmology: A Speculative Framework for Reinterpreting Fundamental Physical Phenomena
Author: John Hulbert
Abstract
This paper proposes Waveframe Cosmology, a conceptual model that reinterprets the foundational elements of physicsspace, light, matter, and gravitythrough a novel lens. Central to this framework is the assertion that the universe emerges from interactions among spatial voids and propagating waves, governed by a universal principle of least resistance. This model offers alternative explanations for phenomena such as gravitational effects, quantum interference, black hole dynamics, and cosmic evolution, diverging from mainstream theories like general relativity and the Big Bang model. While speculative and qualitative, Waveframe Cosmology aims to provide a cohesive and intuitive perspective, encouraging a reevaluation of established paradigms in physical science.
1. Introduction
Contemporary physics has achieved remarkable explanatory power through frameworks such as quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the Standard Model of particle physics. However, these theories often rely on abstract constructse.g., dark matter, dark energy, and spacetime curvaturethat, while mathematically consistent, may obscure a more fundamental understanding of reality. Additionally, unresolved questions persist, including the nature of quantum measurement, the physical basis of singularities, and the origin of the universe itself.Waveframe Cosmology emerges as an alternative conceptual framework, prioritizing philosophical coherence over mathematical formalism. It posits that the universe's structure and dynamics can be understood through the interplay of spatial voids, wave-like disturbances, and a principle of minimal resistance. This paper outlines the core tenets of this model, explores its implications for key physical phenomena, and invites further exploration of its premises.
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1 The Universe as a Network of Voids
The foundational hypothesis of Waveframe Cosmology is that the universe originates from spatial voidsregions devoid of intrinsic content. These voids are not mere absences but active participants in a dynamic system, interacting through mutual accommodation. When one void expands, adjacent voids contract, creating gradients in spatial density. This process, termed spatial differentiation, generates the conditions for emergent phenomena.Matter, in this view, is not a collection of discrete particles but a localized condensation of space itself. High-density regions form amidst a surrounding matrix of expanded space, suspended within an infinite lattice of voids. This conceptualization suggests a universe structured by contrasts in spatial density rather than by fundamental "stuff."
2.2 Light as a Spatial Waveform
Light occupies a primary role in Waveframe Cosmology, redefined as a continuous wave rather than a quantized entity (e.g., photons). These waves are fluctuations in spatial density, propagating through the void lattice like ripples across a fluid medium. Each luminous sourcestars, quasars, or other radiant bodiesemits such waves, contributing to a cosmic tapestry of overlapping and interfering patterns.This wave-centric view posits that space is not a static container but a dynamic wavefield, actively shaped by the cumulative influence of all radiative sources. The interference of these waves underlies the apparent stability and structure of the observable universe, challenging the particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics with a purely undulatory model.
2.3 The Principle of Least Resistance
A unifying axiom in this framework is the Principle of Least Resistance, which asserts that all entitiesspatial voids, waves, and matterfollow trajectories that minimize opposition. This principle transcends classical notions of least action or entropy, acting as an ontological driver of universal behavior. It governs phenomena across scales, from the propagation of light waves to the orbital dynamics of galaxies, ensuring that systems evolve along paths of maximal efficiency.
3. Applications and Implications
3.1 Reconceptualizing Gravity
In contrast to general relativitys spacetime curvature, Waveframe Cosmology attributes gravity to asymmetries in the spatial wavefield. Massive objects disrupt the omnidirectional flow of waves by absorbing or deflecting them, creating regions of differential wave pressure. For example, a planetary body like Earth attenuates waves from below more than from above, establishing a net downward force on nearby objects.This wave-pressure model reinterprets gravity as a push rather than a pull, arising from the collective action of countless spatial waves. It eliminates the need for a curved spacetime metric, offering a mechanistic explanation rooted in wave dynamics.
3.2 The Structure of Matter
Subatomic particles are reimagined as emergent nodes within the wavefield. A proton, for instance, is a stable locus of condensed space, maintained by the balanced tension of converging and diverging waves. Electrons mirror this structure in an inverse configuration, their opposite charge reflecting complementary wave patterns. Neutrons, meanwhile, serve as transient mediators within atomic nuclei, stabilizing the interplay between protons and electrons.This wave-nexus model suggests that particles are not static entities but dynamic processes, continuously sustained by interactions with the ambient wavefield. Their persistence depends on an ongoing exchange of energy with the surrounding spatial medium.
3.3 Quantum Interference and the Double-Slit Experiment
The double-slit experiment, a hallmark of quantum mechanics, is reframed in Waveframe Cosmology as a straightforward demonstration of wave behavior. When a spatial wave passes through dual slits, it diffracts and interferes, producing characteristic patterns on a detector. Detection does not involve wave collapse but rather a resonant interaction, where the detector extracts energy from a portion of the wave sufficient to register an event.This interpretation eliminates the need for probabilistic wave functions or many-worlds hypotheses, presenting quantum phenomena as natural consequences of wavefield dynamics.
3.4 Black Holes as Spatial Vortices
Black holes are reconceived as spatial vortices, formed by the convergence of intense wave flows at galactic scales. Rather than singularities of infinite density, they are regions of extreme spatial distortion, channeling matter and energy through a cyclical process. Incoming matter is disassembled by the vortexs dynamics, its components redistributed into the broader wavefield.This model aligns with a cyclical cosmology, where black holes act as engines of both destruction and renewal, maintaining cosmic equilibrium.
3.5 A Steady-State Cosmos
Rejecting the Big Bangs singular origin, Waveframe Cosmology envisions a universe without a definitive beginning. Matter emerges continuously in the low-density voids between galaxies, where stable wave configurations facilitate condensation. Simultaneously, black holes recycle existing matter, perpetuating a dynamic balance of creation and dissolution. This steady-state or cyclical model portrays the cosmos as an eternal, self-regulating system.
4. Discussion
Waveframe Cosmology diverges significantly from mainstream physics by prioritizing conceptual simplicity over mathematical precision. Its emphasis on voids, waves, and resistance offers a unified narrative that contrasts with the compartmentalized approaches of quantum field theory and cosmology. While lacking empirical predictions or quantitative rigor, it provides a thought-provoking alternative for phenomena that remain incompletely understood, such as dark matters nature or gravitys quantum underpinnings.
5. Conclusion
This paper introduces Waveframe Cosmology as a speculative framework designed to inspire alternative perspectives on the universes fundamental nature. By redefining space, light, and matter as products of void interactions and wave dynamics, it challenges conventional assumptions and encourages a holistic reconsideration of physical reality. While not a replacement for established theories, it serves as an invitation to explore beyond current paradigms.I welcome feedback to refine and extend these ideas, fostering dialogue on the questions: What is space? What is light? What is matter?
Author: John Hulbert
Abstract
This paper proposes Waveframe Cosmology, a conceptual model that reinterprets the foundational elements of physicsspace, light, matter, and gravitythrough a novel lens. Central to this framework is the assertion that the universe emerges from interactions among spatial voids and propagating waves, governed by a universal principle of least resistance. This model offers alternative explanations for phenomena such as gravitational effects, quantum interference, black hole dynamics, and cosmic evolution, diverging from mainstream theories like general relativity and the Big Bang model. While speculative and qualitative, Waveframe Cosmology aims to provide a cohesive and intuitive perspective, encouraging a reevaluation of established paradigms in physical science.
1. Introduction
Contemporary physics has achieved remarkable explanatory power through frameworks such as quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the Standard Model of particle physics. However, these theories often rely on abstract constructse.g., dark matter, dark energy, and spacetime curvaturethat, while mathematically consistent, may obscure a more fundamental understanding of reality. Additionally, unresolved questions persist, including the nature of quantum measurement, the physical basis of singularities, and the origin of the universe itself.Waveframe Cosmology emerges as an alternative conceptual framework, prioritizing philosophical coherence over mathematical formalism. It posits that the universe's structure and dynamics can be understood through the interplay of spatial voids, wave-like disturbances, and a principle of minimal resistance. This paper outlines the core tenets of this model, explores its implications for key physical phenomena, and invites further exploration of its premises.
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1 The Universe as a Network of Voids
The foundational hypothesis of Waveframe Cosmology is that the universe originates from spatial voidsregions devoid of intrinsic content. These voids are not mere absences but active participants in a dynamic system, interacting through mutual accommodation. When one void expands, adjacent voids contract, creating gradients in spatial density. This process, termed spatial differentiation, generates the conditions for emergent phenomena.Matter, in this view, is not a collection of discrete particles but a localized condensation of space itself. High-density regions form amidst a surrounding matrix of expanded space, suspended within an infinite lattice of voids. This conceptualization suggests a universe structured by contrasts in spatial density rather than by fundamental "stuff."
2.2 Light as a Spatial Waveform
Light occupies a primary role in Waveframe Cosmology, redefined as a continuous wave rather than a quantized entity (e.g., photons). These waves are fluctuations in spatial density, propagating through the void lattice like ripples across a fluid medium. Each luminous sourcestars, quasars, or other radiant bodiesemits such waves, contributing to a cosmic tapestry of overlapping and interfering patterns.This wave-centric view posits that space is not a static container but a dynamic wavefield, actively shaped by the cumulative influence of all radiative sources. The interference of these waves underlies the apparent stability and structure of the observable universe, challenging the particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics with a purely undulatory model.
2.3 The Principle of Least Resistance
A unifying axiom in this framework is the Principle of Least Resistance, which asserts that all entitiesspatial voids, waves, and matterfollow trajectories that minimize opposition. This principle transcends classical notions of least action or entropy, acting as an ontological driver of universal behavior. It governs phenomena across scales, from the propagation of light waves to the orbital dynamics of galaxies, ensuring that systems evolve along paths of maximal efficiency.
3. Applications and Implications
3.1 Reconceptualizing Gravity
In contrast to general relativitys spacetime curvature, Waveframe Cosmology attributes gravity to asymmetries in the spatial wavefield. Massive objects disrupt the omnidirectional flow of waves by absorbing or deflecting them, creating regions of differential wave pressure. For example, a planetary body like Earth attenuates waves from below more than from above, establishing a net downward force on nearby objects.This wave-pressure model reinterprets gravity as a push rather than a pull, arising from the collective action of countless spatial waves. It eliminates the need for a curved spacetime metric, offering a mechanistic explanation rooted in wave dynamics.
3.2 The Structure of Matter
Subatomic particles are reimagined as emergent nodes within the wavefield. A proton, for instance, is a stable locus of condensed space, maintained by the balanced tension of converging and diverging waves. Electrons mirror this structure in an inverse configuration, their opposite charge reflecting complementary wave patterns. Neutrons, meanwhile, serve as transient mediators within atomic nuclei, stabilizing the interplay between protons and electrons.This wave-nexus model suggests that particles are not static entities but dynamic processes, continuously sustained by interactions with the ambient wavefield. Their persistence depends on an ongoing exchange of energy with the surrounding spatial medium.
3.3 Quantum Interference and the Double-Slit Experiment
The double-slit experiment, a hallmark of quantum mechanics, is reframed in Waveframe Cosmology as a straightforward demonstration of wave behavior. When a spatial wave passes through dual slits, it diffracts and interferes, producing characteristic patterns on a detector. Detection does not involve wave collapse but rather a resonant interaction, where the detector extracts energy from a portion of the wave sufficient to register an event.This interpretation eliminates the need for probabilistic wave functions or many-worlds hypotheses, presenting quantum phenomena as natural consequences of wavefield dynamics.
3.4 Black Holes as Spatial Vortices
Black holes are reconceived as spatial vortices, formed by the convergence of intense wave flows at galactic scales. Rather than singularities of infinite density, they are regions of extreme spatial distortion, channeling matter and energy through a cyclical process. Incoming matter is disassembled by the vortexs dynamics, its components redistributed into the broader wavefield.This model aligns with a cyclical cosmology, where black holes act as engines of both destruction and renewal, maintaining cosmic equilibrium.
3.5 A Steady-State Cosmos
Rejecting the Big Bangs singular origin, Waveframe Cosmology envisions a universe without a definitive beginning. Matter emerges continuously in the low-density voids between galaxies, where stable wave configurations facilitate condensation. Simultaneously, black holes recycle existing matter, perpetuating a dynamic balance of creation and dissolution. This steady-state or cyclical model portrays the cosmos as an eternal, self-regulating system.
4. Discussion
Waveframe Cosmology diverges significantly from mainstream physics by prioritizing conceptual simplicity over mathematical precision. Its emphasis on voids, waves, and resistance offers a unified narrative that contrasts with the compartmentalized approaches of quantum field theory and cosmology. While lacking empirical predictions or quantitative rigor, it provides a thought-provoking alternative for phenomena that remain incompletely understood, such as dark matters nature or gravitys quantum underpinnings.
5. Conclusion
This paper introduces Waveframe Cosmology as a speculative framework designed to inspire alternative perspectives on the universes fundamental nature. By redefining space, light, and matter as products of void interactions and wave dynamics, it challenges conventional assumptions and encourages a holistic reconsideration of physical reality. While not a replacement for established theories, it serves as an invitation to explore beyond current paradigms.I welcome feedback to refine and extend these ideas, fostering dialogue on the questions: What is space? What is light? What is matter?
Comments (13)
The evidence is everywhere.
Show us. At least provide references.
I don't know what you want. There are a thousand references from all areas of physics and cosmology. I'm defining how I think the mechanics of all these things work. I'm not refuting the data. I'm explaining what I think is actually happening. If you don't like it or think its wrong or stupid then that's fine. I'm grateful you even read it.
One thing I will say is; if you do consider every photon of light as a wave, and you count how many must be passing in every point in space, in justt one instance, the number is in the billions. If you consider the universe is any bigger than the observable then the number goes up exponentially. If you take the measurement over a miniscule fraction of time instead of one moment the number jumps again and if you increase the size to even the plank length then it goes up once more. I feel like that's enough action to create the entire fabric of space.
... is pseudoscience, thus for Einsteinian (as well as Everettian) physics the following still suffice:
Three-dimensional continuum.
Radiation.
Mass.
Quoting Razorback kitten
An appeal to personal incredulity is just denialism (E. Becker), to wit:
[quote=Neil deGrasse Tyson]The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you ... The good thing about Science is that its true, whether or not you believe in it.[/quote]
It may be more a case of them not knowing how to discuss what you are presenting in a way thats meaningful for both them and you. Or they might think theres just so much to unpick there that its just not worth even trying.
Im happy to discuss it, but you have to accept that I might not be able to grasp just what you are thinking, because it is a personal experience for you. But we might be able to reach some common understanding.
This would be fine if he were presenting this as philosophy or spiritualism, but hes presenting it as science.
Thanks you for your kind words.