Solving the Fine Life Problem
The self is ineffable, immediate reality. It may give meaning to its existence, interpreting itself first as qualia, then abstracting qualia as patterned activity, or physics. Occupying these projected layers of intelligibility it conjures an identityits ego. The ego may see itself as one individual among many, a discrete excitation of an underlying field.
One should expect to be a typical individualsay, a hydrogen ionbut the extreme opposite is the case. To resolve this discrepancy, and thereby render sapient life ordinary, unprivileged, or otherwise expected, we must invoke the Everett interpretation and posit that each individual perceives the timeline in which they become conscious of the self. Existence then becomes a blossoming tree of self-realization, with one's life but a single branch. Flowering occurs when we finally learn to stop inflicting misery upon ourselves, dissolving the ego into blissful, timeless, and undivided awareness.
One should expect to be a typical individualsay, a hydrogen ionbut the extreme opposite is the case. To resolve this discrepancy, and thereby render sapient life ordinary, unprivileged, or otherwise expected, we must invoke the Everett interpretation and posit that each individual perceives the timeline in which they become conscious of the self. Existence then becomes a blossoming tree of self-realization, with one's life but a single branch. Flowering occurs when we finally learn to stop inflicting misery upon ourselves, dissolving the ego into blissful, timeless, and undivided awareness.
Comments (4)
What would be an example of this in action? I suspect some people should probably be harder on themselves than they are.
Quoting Dogbert
What does this mean?
Quoting Dogbert
I'm having trouble interpreting this one because I honestly can't remember the last time someone 'wronged me.' People have made mistakes that made things harder for me in some ways, but I havent been a specific target. The second part, about inflicting anger on yourself: what do you mean by that? How does one inflict anger on themselves? Do you mean that by being angry at others, you're actually harming yourself in the process?
Quoting Dogbert
Do you mean inflicting misery, here? Do you mean by this that experiencing grief amounts to inflicting it? Or do you mean that you may become resentful and try to share the misery?
Some of what you're advocating has Christian and Buddhist overtones, but ultimately the simplified maxim of Stoicism, so beloved by our self-development gurus these days and foundational to CBT, may address all of this too. 'Its not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.' - Epictetus
Edit: I got up this morning and rewrote the essay to include this paragraph:
When you fall short of your expectations, do not compound the problem by inflicting shame or guilt upon yourself. Do not turn an offense into suffering by inflicting anger upon yourself. Do not inflict grief upon yourself. Do not inflict craving upon yourself. Self-realization occurs when you finally learn to stop inflicting misery upon yourself, dissolving the ego into blissful, timeless, undivided awareness.
Hopefully that's a little more clear. I struggle with adding enough detail sometimes.